<![CDATA[Time to get this party started... (again...)]]>Oh my heck, it has happened. WiredForWar has been re-erected after degrading down to ashes and eventually, sadly, dying out.

Lord, I've missed this place. I remember the good old days where I, as a weird and socially awkward angsty teen, came to visit nearly every day after another boring day at school. I remained to one of the very last visitors until we finally, sadly but inevitably, got greeted with a "404 not found"...

Well, those days are over. It's time for a fresh start. I annoit Hayden as our new Overlord, our Führer, our Leader of this somewhat holy (virtual) structure.

Time to celebrate! Bring out the beer, grab a pretty chick and let's parteh!... Wh... What do you mean, there are no chicks present? No, Hayden, I don't see anyone else in here... Yes, Hayden, I know we're all alone...

Sshh, shut it! I know, not a lot to be seen here, yet. But it will change. We will rise. Once again, we shall rise!

/motivational speech

Hey, seriously, good to see this place up and running again, though ;) Awesome shit. You got a new daily visitor xD Now to bring back Deliverance, Jeballi, Sloik, Hogay, Judas and all the other cool dudes ;) Heeeeey lesgo!

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/topic/4/time-to-get-this-party-started-againRSS for NodeSat, 11 Apr 2026 02:58:34 GMTSun, 25 Jan 2015 19:40:43 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:49:11 GMT]]>Nope its back :) Just quietish at the moment

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/995http://wiredforwar.org/post/995Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:49:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Sat, 21 Nov 2015 17:26:40 GMT]]>Woah. I thought this place was gone forever.

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/991http://wiredforwar.org/post/991Sat, 21 Nov 2015 17:26:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:34:19 GMT]]>Heheheh yup old skool heh

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/950http://wiredforwar.org/post/950Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:34:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:57:53 GMT]]>@TheOriginalFoxx
"Requires 3D Accelerator"

Now I get why it's so old.
It was one of the first games that used 3D technology, anyway!

yay.gorilla

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/949http://wiredforwar.org/post/949Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:57:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:08:04 GMT]]>Lol allright.
Look wut I found!

IMG_20151017_165923.jpg

In Semi mint condition too!

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/948http://wiredforwar.org/post/948Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:08:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:36:31 GMT]]>@TheOriginalFoxx
Welcome back! Sorry to hear about your issues.

Anyway, as @Encrypted said I'm pretty busy right now, but hopefully will be doing more machines 'stuff' soon.

I also recently bought a copy of machines:
machines.png

:)

Also would like to have the wiki up, but we're going through a Hayden Hiatus atm (HH for short? haha). I guess I'll shoot him an email.

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/946http://wiredforwar.org/post/946Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:36:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:10:51 GMT]]>@TheOriginalFoxx said:

So whats up?

Lots of concepts and discussions on how OpenMachines could look like. Besides, a few things uploaded, @bilal being busy, @Pisarz posting a lot of stuff and... uh, @Encrypted, that is me, posting a lot of stuff.

Oh, and killer bunnies didn't return yet. We are somehow able to keep them at bay.
Somehow.

carrot_PNG4985.png
BEHOLD THE POWER OF BETA-KAROTEN!

yay.gorilla

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/945http://wiredforwar.org/post/945Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:10:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:51:53 GMT]]>Sorry Sorry Sorry! Oh crap... and here I go again... Life is just way to demanding...lol
Anyhow, judging by the lack of recent postings Im not the only one with a mad schedule...
On my behalf tho, since my last post I have been hospitalized for a weirdass blood infection and had to recover from it, after that had to work my ass off to get up to speed with work again... Also me and the Mrs have been through a rough patch sort a...

So whats up?

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/944http://wiredforwar.org/post/944Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:51:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Thu, 09 Apr 2015 12:06:06 GMT]]>@Pisarz said:

This might cause some confusion: http://wiredforwar.pwsinger.com/
I personally prefer "MACHINES: WIRED FOR WAR".

Uh-oh.
Well, seems like I'm not the only one who types in "Wired for War" and gets this book on a plate.
I guess the game is still a lot older than this book. But, well...

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/433http://wiredforwar.org/post/433Thu, 09 Apr 2015 12:06:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Thu, 09 Apr 2015 01:15:15 GMT]]>This might cause some confusion: http://wiredforwar.pwsinger.com/
I personally prefer "MACHINES: WIRED FOR WAR".

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/431http://wiredforwar.org/post/431Thu, 09 Apr 2015 01:15:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Sun, 05 Apr 2015 21:22:20 GMT]]>I looked through most of the wikis listed on this wikipedia page. Most of them looked really dated. Good luck finding something better than MediaWiki.

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/355http://wiredforwar.org/post/355Sun, 05 Apr 2015 21:22:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Sat, 04 Apr 2015 14:08:40 GMT]]>Alright guys I'll get a wiki running soon. Trying to find something more minimalist than MediaWiki... Open to suggestions.

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/331http://wiredforwar.org/post/331Sat, 04 Apr 2015 14:08:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:14:43 GMT]]>@StonerHate
Haha, yeah agreed.

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/298http://wiredforwar.org/post/298Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:14:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:13:47 GMT]]>@bilal Oh, well. Damn. Seems like you're right. All this time, I thought it was ^^ Then I can understand your point. But still. "Machines: Wired for War" sounds fine by me.

Actually, it doesn't really matter all that much, in hindsight =P

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/297http://wiredforwar.org/post/297Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:13:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:24:12 GMT]]>@StonerHate No, wired for war is not part of the name AFAIK.

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/288http://wiredforwar.org/post/288Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:24:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:04:25 GMT]]>@bilal I meant, take "Machines: Wired for War" as a whole. Not just "Machines". Not just "Wired For War".

"Machines: Wired for War". The entire thing. After all, the "Wired for War" IS a part of the name. No? Also, every other game-Wiki, in my experience, always has the entire name in their Wiki-name =)

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/286http://wiredforwar.org/post/286Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:04:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:46:09 GMT]]>Like I said, majority vote is cool, and it seems most people would prefer wfw anyway. Plus I was probably being too persnickety about something simple. I would love to have it up though because there is some information I would prefer to store there rather than in google docs etc.

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/262http://wiredforwar.org/post/262Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:46:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:28:21 GMT]]>Wired for War sounds better in my opinion. Plus it's what this site is called.

I'm for Wired for War ;D

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/249http://wiredforwar.org/post/249Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:28:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:23:16 GMT]]>@bilal Know what, I'll throw my own suggestion here.

Machines: Wired for War and Machines: Wired for War Ultimate Wiki

The best source of knowledge 'bout silicon machines!

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/247http://wiredforwar.org/post/247Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:23:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:03:49 GMT]]>@StonerHate
Because the game is called Machines, not Wired for War. If the wiki is called "Wired For War" wiki, that implies that it's about the website, and includes content for machines (Which would be a perfect name in my opinion if that is the intent for the wiki). I'm talking about semantics to ensure clarity of what the subject is, not just what would sound nice.

P.S.: What do you mean add the wired for war part? I meant "Wired For War Wiki" vs "Machines Wiki."

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/246http://wiredforwar.org/post/246Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:03:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:21:06 GMT]]>@bilal If it's "just going to be based on the game", then I would definitely add the "Wired for War" part. How many games are there with "Machines" in it? Also, just as a general way of classifying the game, because "Machines" on itsself is kinda... broad and covers many (unrelated) topics...

My 2 cents.

Also HOLY SHIT JUDAS WHAT UP DAWG! Awesome to have you back ^^

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/243http://wiredforwar.org/post/243Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:21:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:37:16 GMT]]>@Hayden
Yeah minimalist wiki would be great. I looked at MediaWiki and I'm for it unless some wiki expert knows more. :p

Also, would we want this to be called WiredForWar wiki or Machines wiki? Because if it's just going to be based on the game, I think we should just call it Machines wiki. But that's just my opinion. Majority rules? :)

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/239http://wiredforwar.org/post/239Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:37:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:02:45 GMT]]>@Encrypted

I'm sure Hayden has us covered. He looks down through the clouds from Internet paradise to bring us the gift of unlimited diskspace and bandwidth. :D

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/235http://wiredforwar.org/post/235Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:02:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time to get this party started... (again...) on Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:57:43 GMT]]>@Judas I guess someone has to store everything, and others can just send materials'n'stuff to the server/computer/storage/whatever.

And yeah, minimalist design... I love it. Feels so clean, so... small.

So, we've got to describe units first, I think. Especially agressors should be first in my opinion.

]]>http://wiredforwar.org/post/232http://wiredforwar.org/post/232Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:57:43 GMT