Time to get this party started... (again...)
-
@Gameuser10 Sidenote: could you ask that guy to make a resized version of 1920 x 1080? xD Not sure if I can manage it all by myself and resizing his work manually would mean loss of quality... Without your name in it, that is =3
-
@StonerHate Well.. the source file I gave him was the Machines Wallpaper, 1024 x 768. You want me to ask him to do it again without the text?
Also... I mod this game called "Halo: Combat Evolved," thought it would be fun to stick MWFW sfx in it: AI Battle -
Oh, yeah, saw this video. It was damn great!
I don't play Halo, though.
-
@Gameuser10 That would be awesome =3
And damn, Halo + Machines SFX = pretty damn nice =D Cool idea.
-
Hello there!
Great to see the website is back to life! Now I won't have to be the only available source for downloading Machines :P
Gonna need to cook something up to celebrate such an occasion! -
Welcome. It's great that people are comin' back to this li'l oasis. Hopefully it won't die like the previous one...
-
Hey guys! Looks like I found you before you found me ;)
Love what you did with the place! And all the downloads! It's like stumbling into an ancient library of wisdom and awesomeness!
-
@Judas Indeed it is. But this ancient library has been renovated, and is an oasis now.
Hopefully bunnies WON'T overtake everything.
-
Woah, hey! I tried e-mailing your old e-mail awhile back and got a bounce, so I wasn't sure we'd see you here again. Glad you made it back! It's weird after so long, we're all like... grown up now.
If you're in the mood for some heavy nostalgia and cringe, http://forums.wiredforwar.org . If you see anything worth saving, move it here!
-
@Hayden
On an (almost?) related note, are we going to have the wiki put back up? -
Well, I'm still trying to build this one.
-
@Gameuser10
Well if he puts it up we can just pull all of the information over. -
-
@Hayden Oh yeah, tried to make my own wiki. Turns out you need to have a computer/server to store everything in it, but I guess that's easy to guess and that it'll actually be easy.
-
I do like minimalist. I love the way this forum looks.
Me no smart enough to think about wiki's tho, so I'll let you guys decide
-
@Judas I guess someone has to store everything, and others can just send materials'n'stuff to the server/computer/storage/whatever.
And yeah, minimalist design... I love it. Feels so clean, so... small.
So, we've got to describe units first, I think. Especially agressors should be first in my opinion.
-
@Encrypted
I'm sure Hayden has us covered. He looks down through the clouds from Internet paradise to bring us the gift of unlimited diskspace and bandwidth. :D
-
@Hayden
Yeah minimalist wiki would be great. I looked at MediaWiki and I'm for it unless some wiki expert knows more. :pAlso, would we want this to be called WiredForWar wiki or Machines wiki? Because if it's just going to be based on the game, I think we should just call it Machines wiki. But that's just my opinion. Majority rules? :)
-
@bilal If it's "just going to be based on the game", then I would definitely add the "Wired for War" part. How many games are there with "Machines" in it? Also, just as a general way of classifying the game, because "Machines" on itsself is kinda... broad and covers many (unrelated) topics...
My 2 cents.
Also HOLY SHIT JUDAS WHAT UP DAWG! Awesome to have you back ^^
-
@StonerHate
Because the game is called Machines, not Wired for War. If the wiki is called "Wired For War" wiki, that implies that it's about the website, and includes content for machines (Which would be a perfect name in my opinion if that is the intent for the wiki). I'm talking about semantics to ensure clarity of what the subject is, not just what would sound nice.P.S.: What do you mean add the wired for war part? I meant "Wired For War Wiki" vs "Machines Wiki."
